BTC / ETH
Do both markets enter WAIT in the same minute more often than fixed shifted controls?
Instead of a thousand improvised trading tips: three falsifiable questions addressed to actual recorded market states, fixed negative controls, and transparent contradictions.
No improvised predictions: three predetermined market pairs, frozen mathematical controls and a two-half diagnostic of recorded history. The output is research candidates — not trading signals.
Do both markets enter WAIT in the same minute more often than fixed shifted controls?
Do both markets enter WAIT in the same minute more often than fixed shifted controls?
Do both markets enter WAIT in the same minute more often than fixed shifted controls?
Same-minute overlap minus the mean of eight fixed phase shifts. Positive means more overlaps; negative means fewer.
Independently read the BTC, ETH and SOL market-state journals. Compare actual recorded transitions and their frequency — never rebrand observation frequency as a price forecast.
Each bar counts stored market-state entries during a 10-minute interval. Missing sources are never interpolated.
Count same-minute UTC WAIT-state arrivals in BTC, ETH and SOL. Contrast with 12 precommitted circular time shifts — a descriptive negative control, not proof of predictability.
This compares co-occurring state events, not trading strategies. Shifts preserve within-market bursts but don't establish independence. Excess overlap is neither a p-value, validated alpha, nor a causal effect.
Past-event screening cannot retroactively preregister a future experiment. Genuine scientific confirmation requires a separate independently preregistered prospective study.